Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 months agothanks lain (rule)lemmy.blahaj.zoneexternal-linkmessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkthanks lain (rule)lemmy.blahaj.zoneInterstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 months agomessage-square86fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareunalivejoy@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 months ago172.16.0.0/12 is a valid prefix for private networks. In fact, you get more hosts than 192.168.0.0/16, but less than 10.0.0.0/8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserved_IP_addresses
minus-square4am@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoYeah, it’s not that it’s not valid for private networks, it’s that 172.16.42.x is common for WiFi Pineapples
minus-squaremagi@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoEvery “well ackqually” person in this thread is insufferable
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoIDK, I find them quite sufferable and in fact I’m learning something from this thread.
172.16.0.0/12 is a valid prefix for private networks. In fact, you get more hosts than 192.168.0.0/16, but less than 10.0.0.0/8.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserved_IP_addresses
Yeah, it’s not that it’s not valid for private networks, it’s that 172.16.42.x is common for WiFi Pineapples
Every “well ackqually” person in this thread is insufferable
IDK, I find them quite sufferable and in fact I’m learning something from this thread.
Can’t argue with that, I guess