• Beaver@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Proportional representation without a referendum is the best way for parliament to do what’s necessary to fight against climate change.

      • Beaver@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Because it allows the establishment figure heads and corporate media to fear monger people into staying with first-past-the-post when in reality proportional representation is simpler as it represents the popular share of mps by vote percentage. PR would fix the current polarization in our politics.

        • Iceblade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’d actually lean towards the opposite for similar reasons. I think it’d be hard to get the current politicians to implement proportional representation without a referendum. The current system benefits them. Having a (successful) referendum would give the issue momentum that can keep it going through bureaucratic & political obstacles.

    • undercrust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Louder for those in the back!

      Proportional representation without a referendum is the best way for parliament to do what’s necessary to fight against climate change.

      • Beaver@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yup, I’m done with arguing with bad faith Pierre Poilievre conservatives and corporate liberals about it.

      • Beaver@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        However that is for their people to focus on.

        Canada isn’t nearly doing enough to address climate change and it’s time Canadians have at least 7 choices in each riding instead of 2. We deserve accountability.