Brave hates gays

“we replaced the browser with ad ware, that we even admit we had to ship settings to minimise its malware effect”

Y not gnome web

talk about bad taste

Recent firefox policy change is controversial, but how brave is better?

Brave marketing has gone crazy to convince people it’s less dodgy than Firefox. Come on!

They should’ve picked LibreWolf which ships with uBlock Origin. Brave is a disappointing choice because it supports multi-level marketing pyramid schemes which says enough about their moral compass.

–
✍︎ arscyni.cc: modernity ∝ nature.

Seems like a strange choice. If anything i would’ve expected them to just use a firefox fork or something.

“Mozilla has a bit been shady lately, so we are making the difficult decision to change our default browser to something significantly more shady. We are confident our users will feel safer knowing their data is in even worse hands than before"

That’s gonna be a no from me, dawg

Boo

Well, Brave is -regardless of the companies decisions- still a damn good browser with many build in essentials (TOR, IPFS, Bittorrent…), so, while I PERSONALLY don’t use this anymore (currently I use an heavily patched suckless surf and Dillo) I don’t see much wrong in including this in a distribution especially catering to users switching from windows.

Firefox is bad, Brave is evil. Why did they decide switching is a good idea?

I’m actually not familiar with this distro. But if I installed a Linux distro, and it have brave installed. I would immediately switch.

I have ff installed but uses librewolf for most uses. Should I be worried if ff is in my system? Somebody please explain.