• Philharmonic3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Look I get it, but also, I like fahrenheit and miles. They are more intuitive and closer to the ‘feeling’. 100 degrees is really hot. 100 mph is really fast. Maybe that’s my own bias from growing up with it though

    • Hubi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, I think it’s mostly just a familiarity thing. To me 0°C is cold af, 10°C is chilly, 20°C is nice and 30°C is hot. 100 km/h is fast but not really fast, though I’m probably biased in this regard from regularly driving on the Autobahn lol

      • businessfish@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        exactly! whenever anyone says imperial units are “more intuitive” and better reflect “how it feels to humans”, i can only think: obviously, you grew up with it. that’s what you know.

        no matter what measurement system you were raised on, it will feel intuitive to you and reflect how you as a human experience the world because you are used to measuring things in those units. having said that, i’d much rather we used metric if for nothing else than the ease of unit conversion.

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          When it comes to Fahrenheit, there is some merit to the idea - 0 to 30 is a small scale compared to 0 to 100, and unlike Imperial vs. Metric, Celcius has no base 10 system that makes any more sense than Fahrenheit does. . The opposite is true of kilometers and miles - kilometers is more refined since each unit is a shorter distance.

          I’d prefer the Metric system, but Farenheit over Celcius for temperature measurement.

          • pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            The fixed points (for 0 and 100) are much more logical though and can be used to accurately recreate the scale anywhere (well… it’ll be slightly off on higher altitude since boiling temperature changes but it’s still not far off).

            0°C = water freezes (= it’s snowing)

            100°C = water boils

            meanwhile:

            0°F = the coldest night Mr Fahrenheit experienced, thinking it couldn’t get any colder than that

            100°F = Mr Fahrenheit’s own body temperature (he had a slight fever apparently)

            How would you recreate that??

            • samus12345@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              The temperature of water boiling is not a useful metric when it comes to the weather, as it’s extremely far outside of where humans can live. Science uses Celcius standard, and that seems to work fine, but I see no reason why we should use it for the weather.

              • Allero@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                The temperature of ice melting, on the other hand, is hugely important for weather. 0 point is placed at a very important spot as far as weather observations go.

                Can’t say that of Fahrenheit.

                  • pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    The previous systems also worked fine in other parts of the world, but pretty much every country came to the conclusion that it’s simply smart to switch to the metric system, giving up their own with seemingly random conversions.