- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Israeli warplanes bombed Gaza overnight, bringing an end to the Israel-Hamas ceasefire after two months.
Israeli warplanes bombed Gaza overnight, bringing an end to the Israel-Hamas ceasefire after two months.
Those are empty words, the same Biden had been repeating with zero conviction. Actions speak louder than words.
As VP she couldn’t take action, that’s not the job of VP. She campaigned on a cease fire and two state solution, you were ignoring what she was repeatedly telling you.
Yes, I try to ignore lies when I can. She could have spoken out against the complicity of the Biden Harris administration at any time, and especially once she became the presidential candidate and she chose not to, indicating it will remain business as usual with her.
Again, no, she couldn’t:
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5191087-harris-trump-biden-harris/
You’re choosing to ignore cited sources, that’s your issue.
Is this a joke? Are you pretending Harris did not make a choice here?
She didn’t have a choice. Her entire campaign was Biden people and Biden money. She towed the line or had no campaign.
Of course she had a choice.
She had access to the campaign funds. https://hls.harvard.edu/today/can-kamala-harris-access-biden-campaign-funds/
Campaign funds that would have evaporated if she tried to backbite Biden.
After dropping from the race Biden no longer had control over the campaign funds.
Besides, even if we were to imagine that Biden could still hypothetically somehow take away the campaign funds, Harris still chose to play ball.
Campaign funds that were there to fund a losing message.
The electorate wanted a break from Biden, and if Harris’ campaign funding relied on not breaking with Biden, what does that tell you about the influence and intent of that funding?