• Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Well, since this is a religious discussion, I’m a Christian. It’s always God.

    Job 1:6-12 very clearly shows God granting permission for Satan to test Job.

    1 Kings 22:19-22 shows the “court in heaven” and God soliciting ideas from spirits for enticing Ahab to attack Ramoth Gilead, where he will die. When a good suggestion is made, God grants permission.

    Exodus 10:1-2 states clearly that God hardened Pharaoh’s heart to not let the slaves go, so that God could display his “signs” (plagues).

    Satan is a liar, and the father of lies.

    Romans 9:19-21 NIV

    One of you will say to me: “Then why does God still blame us? For who is able to resist his will?” But who are you, a human being, to talk back to God? “Shall what is formed say to the one who formed it, ‘Why did you make me like this?’ ” Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use?

      • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Hey, at least you’re judging based on the facts of what the Bible says. God is who He is. He’s not campaigning. You disagree with Him, but at least it’s really Him.

        Of course, that puts you in the same position as Job. You want to judge God. You want to put him on trial. You disagree with Him.

        And if you have the opportunity to question Him directly, you’ll say the same thing Job said.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I’m judging a fictional character based on how he’s characterized by the book he appears in. There may be a higher power, but the god of the Bible certainly ain’t it.

          • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Certainly? You have a better candidate? Baal? Molech? Satan, perhaps?

            You do you; pick a side, deny the battle, anything you choose.

            I’m quite seriously suggesting that the God of the Bible, and specifically the Christian God, is is the most perfect God that could be imagined, and yet wholly unexpected as He is revealed. The God of the Bible soothes no one. He ruffles everyone’s feathers. He is pure perfect and exacting. Yet there is love and mercy there.

            Now, His followers have done a lot to screw up that presentation. But that’s as it always has been. In the Old Testament, in Jesus’s day, and now, the people of God - even those with direct divine revelation - have been misrepresenting Him.

            Joshua 24:15 NIV

            But if serving the Lord seems undesirable to you, then choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your ancestors served beyond the Euphrates, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land you are living. [Or the gods of reason, science, and unbelief?] But as for me and my household, we will serve the Lord.”

            • samus12345@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              42 minutes ago

              Certainly. Any candidate that doesn’t have a traceable origin as being created by people would be a good start, which all the religions of the world do.

              I’m quite seriously suggesting that the God of the Bible, and specifically the Christian God, is is the most perfect God that could be imagined

              Yes, that’s what people of every religion say about their god. I’m guessing your parents are Christian?

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 hours ago

          And if you have the opportunity to question Him directly, you’ll say the same thing Job said.

          That would be what, “Why are you so weirdly obsessed with Leviathan?” after Job 41?

          • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Haha, Leviathan was certainly the “big bad” in Job. I don’t know what creature was being referred to (maybe a species of large crocodile?) but yes, he gets a lot of air time.

            No, I meant Job 42:3, “Surely I spoke of things I did not understand, things too wonderful for me to know.”

        • FrostBlazer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I would add that not every author is writing unbiased in the Bible. We know now for instance that some books near the end of the Bible were attributed to Paul may not have been written by him, but by some of the people under Paul in the early church. So adding parts about women not holding positions of authority within the Church more or less served to cement their own positions and authority for the early-Christians that were formalizing the religion.

            • FrostBlazer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 hour ago

              From my perspective, the Bible should have continued to been written forward, and included pieces of the issues Christians sought to address in their current times. I think an updated one would have spoken of the poorly of the actions taken by the church and followers alike through the ages, and would have followed people trying to do good in hard times.