• geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Not to mention that disgruntled and/or naive employees will leak things that their employer doesn’t actually want leaked.

    But this is what we believe is happened for Assagne. A disillusioned employee leaked the documents to Assagne.

    It means that people look at what you want them to see rather than what you don’t want them to see.

    This was exactly what the government doesn’t want us to see. What do you believe they are using this as a cover for?

    • CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      What happened after Collateral Murder except that Manning was found out and imprisoned, thereby removing a liability in the US military? What happened after the scandal at Abu Ghraib except letting Iraqis know what will happen to them if they fight or even cross paths with a US soldier?

      We can also look beyond the US stuff; Wikileaks has released plenty of documents on Iran, China and Syria to name just 3 (this was their stated purpose and is pointed out in the article, wikileaks was first started to go after the enemies of the US). The point of building credibility is to then redirect sentiment to the actual target with the segment of the population that does not normally consider that target to be an enemy. Much like Jackson Hinkle is going to be doing soon imo.