• SlippiHUD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I never said burn more oil?

    Also I’m not a huge fan of the idea of seeding the atmosphere with salt water, that salt has to come down eventually.

    • Monstera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I was just continuing the conversation, I didn’t mean you said we should burn oil. I see how that is a possible reading tho, my b

      Yeah, salt has it’s issues but I see it as the easiest and possibly least disruptive option. We’d “just” have to implement a fleet of autonomous sail boats with solar powered mist makers sucking ocean water and misting it up

    • ignirtoq@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m not a huge fan of the idea of seeding the atmosphere with salt water, that salt has to come down eventually.

      That’s how clouds are naturally seeded anyway, with salt. Rain drops form (condense) around tiny airborne matter, like salt or pollution. Every rain drop is formed this way; drops can’t actually condense without something to nucleate on. What they form around comes down with the drop. We wouldn’t be trying to leave the salt up there. The purpose of the salt is to cause more drops to condense, i.e. more clouds to form.

      • SlippiHUD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m concerned too much more salt may lead to salting of land, but I may be worried over nothing.

        I also don’t fully trust our ability to predict negative outcomes if it’s profitable to ignore them.

        • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          You would hope that it would be diluted by each raindrop that brings it back and its distribution over a wide area, but hope isn’t much to go on.