Nobody said anything about drawings, but interesting default argument… Thanks for telling the class that you’re a lolicon pedo.
the liberty of masses be stomped and murdered
Nobody said that anyone should be stomped and murdered, so calm down, lmao. We’re just saying that child porn producers, consumers, and apologists are vile, disgusting perverts who should be held accountable for their crimes against children.
…being firmly and unwaveringly against the sexual exploitation of children.
I really can’t stress enough that this was an actual 15 year old girl who was pornified with AI. This isn’t some “erotic drawings” argument, the end results were photorealistic nudes with her unmodified face. This isn’t some completely AI generated likeness. Pictures of her from social media were exploited to remove her clothes and fill in the gaps with models trained on porn. It was nonconsensual pornography of a kid.
Anyone who read this story, and feels the need to defend what was done to this girl is a fucking monster.
I can’t believe that the person defending sex crimes of this magnitude is a fucking mod.
Refute literally anything I said? My post history in this thread, mostly replying to you, is still present. My absurdity? You’ll go down as the laughing stock you are right now. Only need to take a quick look around this thread to realize your view on this is unpopular. “this is Lemmy”, yeah, and apparently people like you still exist on the internet. You’re defending/playing down the production and consumption of photorealistic sexual imagery depicting a REAL underage girl.
Then don’t defend them? You’re trying to tell everyone that what is literally above in an article, about a child who had PHOTOREALISTIC pictures made of her, that it isn’t CSAM.
It is. Deleting everyone’s comments who disagree with you will not change that, and if anything, WILL make you seem even more like the bad guy.
Removed by mod
Nobody said anything about drawings, but interesting default argument… Thanks for telling the class that you’re a lolicon pedo.
Nobody said that anyone should be stomped and murdered, so calm down, lmao. We’re just saying that child porn producers, consumers, and apologists are vile, disgusting perverts who should be held accountable for their crimes against children.
Removed by mod
They’re making them unsafe? You and your bullshit are making them unsafe. Every comment you post reeks of your true character. Go get help.
Removed by mod
Do you really think being insufferable is going to change any minds here?
Removed by mod
You are absolutely not coming across as calm fwiw.
Removed by mod
I’m making kids unsafe by…
checks notes
…being firmly and unwaveringly against the sexual exploitation of children.
I really can’t stress enough that this was an actual 15 year old girl who was pornified with AI. This isn’t some “erotic drawings” argument, the end results were photorealistic nudes with her unmodified face. This isn’t some completely AI generated likeness. Pictures of her from social media were exploited to remove her clothes and fill in the gaps with models trained on porn. It was nonconsensual pornography of a kid.
Anyone who read this story, and feels the need to defend what was done to this girl is a fucking monster.
I can’t believe that the person defending sex crimes of this magnitude is a fucking mod.
Removed by mod
You’re defending it by playing it down as simple defamation. Quit your bullshit and go get help.
Removed by mod
Refute literally anything I said? My post history in this thread, mostly replying to you, is still present. My absurdity? You’ll go down as the laughing stock you are right now. Only need to take a quick look around this thread to realize your view on this is unpopular. “this is Lemmy”, yeah, and apparently people like you still exist on the internet. You’re defending/playing down the production and consumption of photorealistic sexual imagery depicting a REAL underage girl.
Found the weirdo
Found the Loli* ftfy
attack the argument, not the person
Removed by mod
Then don’t defend them? You’re trying to tell everyone that what is literally above in an article, about a child who had PHOTOREALISTIC pictures made of her, that it isn’t CSAM.
It is. Deleting everyone’s comments who disagree with you will not change that, and if anything, WILL make you seem even more like the bad guy.