Stamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agoNone. Suffer.lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square152linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkNone. Suffer.lemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agomessage-square152linkfedilink
minus-squareKazuyaDarklight@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoYes which is part of why the major chains are owned and controlled by companies, but then that makes the whole thing pointless. IMO, a company controlled blockchain may as well just be a DB cluster, it would be faster and more efficient.
minus-squarehddsx@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoAre you saying that they “solve” that by never giving up more than 49% stake? That… seems like a bad solution
Yes which is part of why the major chains are owned and controlled by companies, but then that makes the whole thing pointless. IMO, a company controlled blockchain may as well just be a DB cluster, it would be faster and more efficient.
Are you saying that they “solve” that by never giving up more than 49% stake?
That… seems like a bad solution