IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 12 days agoDer krieg ist verlorenlemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkDer krieg ist verlorenlemmy.worldIndustryStandard@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 12 days agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squareIndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 days agoYou do not understand. I am saying Harris should not have tried to be a lesser evil but a greater good.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 days agoYou could do a “this is worthless” meme with this comment right here.
minus-squareIndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 days agoDoing a little less genocide is bad Not doing genocide is good. How is this so difficult to understand?
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 days agoBecause not doing genocide is not on the menu. You have a little less genocide or a lot more genocide. That’s your lot If you refuse to choose because you don’t like either, you end up with the one you like the least.
minus-squareIndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 days ago Because not doing genocide is not on the menu. Indeed. My argument is Chef Harris should have put that on the menu. Imagine the stakes. Not genocide vs genocide! The moral imperative on the ballot!
minus-squareTodd Bonzalez@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 days agoShe could have, if enough people voted for her.
minus-squareIndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-211 days agoEnough people would have voted for her if she did. But she did not.
You do not understand.
I am saying Harris should not have tried to be a lesser evil but a greater good.
You could do a “this is worthless” meme with this comment right here.
Doing a little less genocide is bad
Not doing genocide is good.
How is this so difficult to understand?
Because not doing genocide is not on the menu. You have a little less genocide or a lot more genocide. That’s your lot
If you refuse to choose because you don’t like either, you end up with the one you like the least.
Indeed. My argument is Chef Harris should have put that on the menu.
Imagine the stakes. Not genocide vs genocide! The moral imperative on the ballot!
She could have, if enough people voted for her.
Enough people would have voted for her if she did. But she did not.