• TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Well the US has no stimulate-able domestic industry so isolating China is the only realistic option. And this has been clear for at least a decade. There is no domestic industry making these things at any usable scale.

    Medium-scale solar panel installations are backed up over a year btw.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      US manufacturing currently sat at 26 GW annually, with a 71% increase in the first quarter of the year. Demand being high is also unsurprising.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yes, most certainly. Spikes in demand can do that. If 71% growth remains consistent, it’ll be resolved in short order. Though it’ll probably dip as the overall manufacturing capacity increases, since its just a percentage of the total.

            • Carrolade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              Makes sense, Biden’s big investment was just a few years ago. A single year out for medium-sized facilities is very manageable though. Hopefully demand continues to increase alongside production, and it remains a years wait for several years. That would be a sign that demand is continuing to increase.

              • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                Biden’s “big investment” went to finance and high tech wages, not production capacity.

                And no it’s not particularly manageable the industry will need a bailout or fail shortly. They were already bailed out once w/ Silicon Valley Bank, if you recall. They were all rolled up in that. It is needed again because they are not doing well.

                • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  No, actually it went heavily to infrastructure to facilitate future technology, things like electric vehicle charging stations and energy grid, along with more mundane stuff like bridge maintenance and replacement. This stimulates demand, which supply naturally follows in the quest for profits-above-all-else.

                  Not sure how an industry seeing such demand is projected to fail shortly.

                  SVB wasn’t bailed out, it was actually seized. It failed after a bank run following a lot of risky investments into new tech startups, which is a naturally high risk market. It was not due to some sort of failure in the broader solar industry.

                  • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    12 days ago

                    No, actually it went heavily to infrastructure to facilitate future technology

                    No it went to stock buybacks and capitalization for startups.