They don’t compare policies because Harrris doesn’t have real policies. Just allusions to policy that the parliamentarian will eventually overrule.
These people will still be voting for Roe to be codified in 40 years because they keep backing the majority party that cannot deliver because it does not want to help the average American.
They don’t compare policies because Harrris doesn’t have real policies. Just allusions to policy that the parliamentarian will eventually overrule.
These people will still be voting for Roe to be codified in 40 years because they keep backing the majority party that cannot deliver because it does not want to help the average American.
The Democrats have actually passed major new policies, with Harris casting the tiebreaking vote for the Inflation Reduction Act:
It’s not yet enough, but they’ve made over a hundred policy changes in addition
By contrast, the Trump administration went out of their way to roll back as many environmental protections as possible.
Given that choice, it’s worth looking at how Stein can operate as a spoiler:
Scenario 1:
Harris: 1001 votes
Trump: 1000 votes
Stein: 0 votes
Harris wins
Scenario 2:
Harris: 1000 votes
Trump: 1000 votes
Stein: 1 vote
Tied vote, which goes to the courts and Congress, putting Trump in power
Scenario 3:
Harris: 999 votes
Trump: 1000 votes
Stein: 2 votes
Trump wins outright
This spoiler effect makes it really imperative to actively vote for Harris if you want to see any kind of climate action going forward. Republicans know this, which is why they’re the ones funding the Green Party.
It’s bad enough that the European green parties have asked her to step down.