• OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    Tragedy of the commons, but the humans are the cattle.

    For each employer, it’s most profitable to work your slaves to the bone, even if it’s better for every employer to collectively treat their employees well

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      This is good because tragedy of the commons only applies to capitalists. Historically, normal people were capable of using the commons responsibly.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      The only difference as compared with the old, outspoken slavery is this, that the worker of today seems to be free because he is not sold once for all, but piecemeal by the day, the week, the year, and because no one owner sells him to another, but he is forced to sell himself in this way instead, being the slave of no particular person, but of the whole property-holding class.

      Friedrich Engels, The Condition of the Working Class in England (1845)

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    I agree with the sentiment here, but doesn’t birthrate decline correlate with increased income? National birthrates always fall as a country’s per capita income rises.

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Hot take: birthrate is high when it’s economically profitable to have kids - helping hands all around to take care of stuff. When they’re a financial burden for the rest of your life besides substantially worsening your quality of life, birthrate plummets.

    • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Well, they say that, but if you poll Americans of birthing age, most say they want more kids but can’t afford it. Also, on paper I make more than my dad did, even including inflation, but I couldn’t get within a MILE of providing two kids with the lifestyle he did on what I make, so… IS income really increasing in these places?

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Yes, but actually no. AFAIK, it decreases when infant & childhood mortality decrease or when Quality Of Life (QOL) decreases.

      Post-Soviet Europe that was given shock therapy by neocolonialists had decreased QOL and decreased birthrates, and increased deaths of despair. Now that neoliberalism has reached more advanced stages back here in the imperial core, our QOL and birthrates are also decreasing, and our deaths of despair are rising. ‘Deaths Of Despair’ Examines The Steady Erosion Of U.S. Working-Class Life