A new poll suggests that Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein is drawing more voters from former President Donald Trump than from Vice President Kamala Harris.

According to a Noble Predictive Insights survey released last week, Harris holds a narrow lead over Trump in a hypothetical three-way race. With Stein on the ballot, Harris’ lead expands, pointing to a potential spoiler effect similar to what many Democrats blamed Stein for doing to Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

For Trump, the emergence of Stein as a potential spoiler may be a critical factor in battleground states, where even a small shift in votes could determine the outcome. For Harris, Stein’s candidacy could paradoxically provide an unexpected advantage, drawing votes from Trump and narrowing his pathway to victory.

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This is a sentence with words, but the arrangement makes no sense. You sure you didn’t generate that from ChatGPT?

      • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        ? Do you disagree? Isn’t blaming leftists what blue maga is currently priming their voters for if/when they lose?

      • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think it’s funny that someone with “Locke” in their name would seemingly not distinguish between liberals and leftists.

        • Naryn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You realise that you’re not using the word liberal as Locke would either right?

          • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s true, they are (and I guess I am, by extension) using it in a narrower sense than is represented in Locke, who encompasses both the red and blue team, but the Lockean sense would still distinguish between liberals and modern leftism.

      • Arelin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is a sentence with words, but the arrangement makes no sense. You sure you didn’t generate that from ChatGPT?

    • DoubleChad@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Alright I’ll bite. I don’t understand this. The word liberal has two meanings: the classical and the colloquial. The latter is indistinguishable from leftist, so I assume you are using the classical form.

      Classical liberals will still blame leftists, like … blue maga wants them to? Who exactly is blue maga? Jill Stein supporters?

      Classical liberals also span the left-right spectrum right now, with many identifying as libertarian. I struggle to see what you are getting at regardless of who blue maga represents, but maybe there is a point here.

        • DoubleChad@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You mean because I am asking reasonable questions to learn. I have heard the phrase blue maga but am not very familiar with what it means. Meanwhile your post history is nothing but frothing at the mouth vitriol and online angst just like all of Reddit. Why exactly are you somewhere else? You definitely belong there. I seek a place where smarter and more reasonable people discuss.

      • knightly [none/use any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Blue MAGA” are the Democrats who think their shit doesn’t stink and love to insist that any vote that doesn’t go to Harris is a vote for Trump.

        Classical Liberals are right-wing. Yes, this includes the Democrats.

      • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Words can have different colloquial meanings. There is a really crass meaning of liberal that would identify Marx as a liberal, yes, and this is the most popular one in America, but there’s another colloquial meaning (more popular in other anglophone countries, but gaining traction in America) where liberals are basically centrists (in capitalist societies) who might pretend to be progressive but are ultimately moderates to their bones. This came from the proclivities of “Liberal” parties, along with centrists understandably claiming the name of whatever the ruling ideology is, and here it is of course liberalism.

        Among leftist circles, “liberal” is sort of an unmarked term for the moderate definition and the Lockean definition both, like how “guys” can refer to both a group of males and a group of mixed gender, despite “gals” only referring specifically to a group of females (I’m using those terms because they apply to children also, not just men/women).

        So the comment is saying, in translation: “Democrat aligned people will still blame socialists (etc.) like their Democrat ideological cult wants them to.” Does that make sense?

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        No it’s not ingestinguishable from the left, as issues like this show very clearly. That’s just a fiction you’re taught by liberals to fool you into thinking they’re on your side.

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Jesus, bucketing everyone together and then throwing out crazy labels. Sounds like you live by the MAGA playbook.