• suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hate to break it to you, but nearly twice as many Americans think we are providing the right amount of assistance, or should be providing more to Isreal, than think we should be providing less in regards to their war. That is the direction of public pressure.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The primary mover isn’t public pressure, but the US Empire’s economic interests. Support for Israel is both lucrative for the Military Industrial Complex, and helps the US exert power in the region, securing the Petro-Dollar. This is how the US maintains financial supremacy, and hyper-exploits the Global South through brutal Imperialist IMF loans that it can write in its favor.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s a more complicated question, but it’s besides the point: the mechanisms the parties move by are the mechanisms that keep themselves in power, and that’s appealing to their donors.

        • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Are we really a beneficiary? All the economic gains seem to only be realized at the top because the owner class has perfected the art of paying us the absolute minimum we need to survive.

          • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            An excellent question, one of the few in this thread. Not really. But as long as our gas is percieved to be less expensive than most of the rest of the world, and the well paying jobs it creates to build bombs and planes and such continue to exist, it will continue be viewed as beneficial.