Let’s say I decide I’ve had enough with this whole Federation business and that humanity would be better represented by a Starfleet that follows my particular ideology. Assuming I could get enough people for crew and support, why can’t I start my own Starfleet?

I could replicate ship parts until I have a couple vessels. Go to new worlds and present myself as the official first contact of humanity. I could fly to Vulcan or Bajor and tell them no actually my organization represents humanity.

What’s going to stop me?

  • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Raw material, I would imagine. I don’t remember exactly how replicators work in the Star Trek universe, but they either rely on energy, a raw base material, or both. You can’t create something out of nothing so you would need a significant supply chain to produce your fleet.

    If it were that easy, every rogue organization in the galaxy would have already done it before you.

    • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      My understanding is that replicators restructure atoms. In which case an asteroid would be plenty of material for a ship, even if some of it is lost in the process.

      • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        OK cool, now if only you had a ship to go get the asteroid so you could make a ship. My last point still stands though, if it were really that easy…

    • Value Subtracted@startrek.websiteM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep, raw material and a net energy loss.

      The Federation might have both in abundance, but I highly doubt that much energy consumption is allowed.

      • SatyrSack@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        a net energy loss

        Like… some energy just gets destroyed in the process? How does that work?

        • Darohan@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The Laws of Thermodynamics say you will always lose some energy to heat when energy is used to affect a change. I have to imagine this would be particularly so when energy is converted to matter since that’s very involved, but I’m not a physicist so I can’t confirm that.

          Come to think of it, this means that industrial replication plants and shipyards would likely be incredibly hot places, due to the inevitable loss to heat in replicating massive components.

    • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Could I replicate charged batteries, then plug them in? Or would it take more energy to make the battery than you could get out of it? After all a battery is just a chemical reaction.