• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Again, you’re conflating two different things here. Evidence and hearsay are simply not the same thing. There is a big logical difference between something that’s a verifiable a fact and and assertion. The accusation of a million people being held in encampments is the latter. There is no evidence anecdotal or otherwise to support the assertion. Furthermore, legally speaking, both anecdotal evidence and hearsay have zero value if you really want to go down that route.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Again, you’re conflating two different things here. Evidence and hearsay are simply not the same thing.

      I’m not conflating the two, I’m saying hearsay is a type of evidence, it’s just not a very good one. You can use hearsay to support your overall claim, but that can’t be the only peice of evidence you use. It’s not transferrable unless attached to a greater body of evidence.

      There is a big logical difference between something that’s a verifiable a fact and and assertion.

      Yes, hearsay and anecdotal evidence are not proof that something happened. They are a claim that something happened.

      There is no evidence anecdotal or otherwise to support the assertion.

      We’ve just made the whole circle again. I think you may be accidentally conflating the meaning of evidence with the meaning of proof. Perhaps English is your second language?

      “Proof is a fact that demonstrates something to be real or true. Evidence is information that might lead one to believe something to be real or true.”

      Furthermore, legally speaking, both anecdotal evidence and hearsay have zero value if you really want to go down that route.

      That is what I have been saying the entire time.