• silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    You could, for example, cap total importation & extraction at a national or regional level, and lower that cap each year.

    • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m just having trouble imagining the sort of global cooperation required for something like this. It seems significantly more difficult than a carbon tax, which is practically impossible already.

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Cap systems like this are about equivalent to carbon taxes in terms of difficulty in cooperating around, but give certainty about total emissions instead of about future prices. They’re mostly not implemented because they make it clear that you need to actually decarbonize.

      • federal reverse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The US wouldn’t actually need to cooperate with other countries, the US GHG footprint is huge. Even considering just the US military, such a scheme would make a massive difference.

        If implemented US-wide, it would obviously be an issue how you then tax (cheap) imports made with fossil fuels (which incidentally is a question the EU is already pondering) and what to do about your exports. But it should definitely be possible.