Today in our newest take on “older technology is better”: why NAT rules!

  • sep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I guess I am lucky. 3 out of 3 isp’s available from in my region provide IPv6 with a dhcp-pd assigned stable address by default. (Norway)

    • GTG3000@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, here in Russia the ISPs and IT infrastructure guys seem to be treating IPv6 like it has cooties. I can’t find an article (and it’d be in russian anyway) but as far back as 2022, if you get IPv6 you can expect a variety of issues with it, ranging from “you need to reboot your router every once in a while” to “you technically have v6 but good luck actually browsing v6 internet”.

      And of course, why would they give you a stable IP when they can charge for it :T. At least it’s only a third the price of a stable IPv4.

      My current ISP technically provides v6 according to their site - but my connection doesn’t have it, and since there’s nothing about it in the years-old contract, I’d need to redo that if I want to complain.

      • sep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        You have my sympathy. I do not know of a sure way to get isp’s to behave. Espesially not if they have regional monopoly

        • GTG3000@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          There are usually plenty of choices for ISPs here, actually. But switching between them isn’t likely to give me IPv6 since either they share a magistral or the hardware is just plain old. That, and IPv6 is just not a thing anyone markets.

          …and with the current fuckery going on, I doubt many of them have budget for big upgrades. Or maybe even access to hardware to buy.