I can’t believe that I have to post this, but AI kiddie stuff is still kiddie stuff. It may or may not be illegal where you live, but it is not OK to post on this instance and we will ban you with extreme prejudice. Thank you.
Took me a minute to figure out that you weren’t talking about denying content to immature AI models, lol. I may need some food.
literally 1984
In 1984, sexuality is emancipatory for Witson and Julian. It’s an act of resistance, because sex between consenting adults is a life drive (Eros) opposed to a dead society (Thanatos) that crushes individuals.
To link the defense of pedopornography (i.e. of children crushed by forced sexual relations), with 1984 is a complete contradiction in terms.
Them: “But it’s not even real”
Us: “The intent is though, you fucking creep.”
Them: “There’s nothing illegal about it.”
Us: “HOW ARE YOU NOT GETTING THE FUCKING POINT HERE?”
Hard agree. Though I do have a question I imagine these are people with desires(wrong or bad), but a human drive none the less. Acting on that is wrong I fully agree. However if we keep calling them crepes and idiots and other names like this. People who have these desires and realize they are problematic, where can they go? We are literally pushing them away without giving them an option to redeem.
The reason i put this here is because creating this stigma will make more people more desperate, making in turn more kiddie stuff.
For anyone reading this, go to a counselor, a trusted gp, a psychiatrist who doesn’t judge. Do not act on these desires, but find help to talk about them.
Yup. Fundamentally, being attracted to children isn’t any different from a foot fetish. They can’t change how their brain is wired, and they’re not monsters for feeling that way. They should absolutely be able to seek help without concern.
And, while I believe the AI gen stuff is disgusting, if it prevents a real child from being abused… Idk, it’s a super nuanced issue.
Now, that all changes if they start trying to act on those feelings.
