

I actually doubt it will go that far. They’re far more concerned with those precious ad views, and the slowdown from encrypting/decrypting every feed everywhere would almost certainly cause a noticeable downward trend in those ad views.
I actually doubt it will go that far. They’re far more concerned with those precious ad views, and the slowdown from encrypting/decrypting every feed everywhere would almost certainly cause a noticeable downward trend in those ad views.
Autism, now available in the Windows App Store.
Thank you for the list of options. However, please avoid using share.google.com links if you can! Less information they can collect from random web traffic, the better.
To live in a society that grants you that right is a privilege. So, no, the headline is correct.
Your reply kinda reminds me of Thirteenth Floor.
Removed by mod
No
I meant what I said, to and frankly can do without the insulting tone.
Eh, Trump is absolute bottom of my list. Even if it’s by a barely measurable amount, I trust everyone more than Trump. No exceptions.
Well, that guy is about to get so
firedpromoted.
Fixed that for you!
Oh, so if you study something, that magically means there will be no prejudice? Whatever, dude.
Holy straw man, Batman!
Biff! Pow! Bang!
You are clearly defending a prejudice viewpoint. Go on with your bad self, or what the fuck ever. But you can right fuck off with putting words in my mouth to justify your bullshit.
Just so we’re clear, those are all your words, your arguments, your bullshit.
So, exactly what qualifications are necessary to speak out against prejudice?
Not even Signal, though. At least that might be secure. Our moron squad in charge of things used a compromised version that sends everything through a server in Israel, and I heard they broke they E2E encryption to - so you know they’re keeping logs of everything.
Do LLMs in fact evolve?
And is it ever in “spontaneous” fashion? In other words, in order to evolve, do they require human intervention?
First, I pay attention to if an article references an original source. If not, see if they’re the only one reporting the events in question.
I also tend to look at community reactions a lot, see what other random people have to say. That’s a horrible way to verify truth, but on the other end, it’s the effect of the actions or events that will really matter.
And, yeah, I doubt Fox “News” has referenced an original source in decades, so I’m very skeptical of anything they report. And if they’re the only ones talking about something, I generally assume it’s completely false.
Become friends with some gay dudes. Just saying…