• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    My takeaway: Be More Line Norway, with its higher susceptibility to seasonal affected disorder but low meds usage. It makes me think they’re doing something right.

  • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This is such annoying chart. It implies that that these countries on top have more depressed people, but it correlates more accurately with how accessible the antidepressants are

    • Zikeji@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I don’t think it was designed to imply that. None of the language appears to steer the viewer to a specific conclusion, letting the viewer interpret it for themselves.

      That being said, I would agree that the data itself represents both access to mental health care and culture (specifically, if that culture has a stigma against it).

      I think some of the larger countries are not really useful in the dataset though. I’m curious how say, California and say, Alabama, would look in the dataset.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think it was designed to imply that.

        Are you suggesting that “Antidepressant Consumption” just accomplishes the goal of implying people are more depressed accidentally, then? It’s very effective, even if it tries to hide behind language.

      • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Considering that 100+ is red, most is orange, low is yellow, it looks like “look these are the bad countries with depressed people”.